Nevertheless, this interview focuses exclusively on Provincializing Europe - Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. At the time Dipesh Chakrabarty was visiting the city where we live to participate as a keynote speaker in a congress on the Anthropocene, organized by Fundação Culturgest and Centro Interuniversitário de História das Ciências e da Tecnologia.
N2 - This interview was held in Lisbon in January 2020. T2 - Uma conversa com Dipesh Chakrabarty a propósito do vigésimo aniversário de Provincializing Europe At the time Dipesh Chakrabarty was visiting the city where we live to participate as a keynote speaker in a congress on the Anthropocene, organized by Fundaria special issue on the 20th anniversary of Provincializing Europe, our conversation with Dipesh Chakrabarty covers, among other issues, his formative years, his move to Australia and his relation with Marxism. Planned to be part of Práticas da História special issue on the 20th anniversary of Provincializing Europe, our conversation with Dipesh Chakrabarty covers, among other issues, his formative years, his move to Australia and his relation with Marxism.Ībstract = "This interview was held in Lisbon in January 2020. Throughout the last two decades, Provincializing Europe became one of the most influential books in the field of History, with far-reaching implications for theoretical debates on the status of the discipline, ranging from the ethical to the methodological dimensions of its practice. At that point, Dipesh Chakrabarty was already living in the USA, teaching at the University of Chicago, where he still remains a professor, although in the last ten years his main interest has become climate change and the challenges it presents to the discipline of History and the Humanities, not to mention to humanity itself. The book was first published by Princeton University Press in 2000. We discuss these findings in terms of the ecological and evolutionary implications of the temporal separation of larval emergence regarding the use of pupation sites, abiotic stress and risk of predation for these sympatric species.This interview was held in Lisbon in January 2020. conversa concentrated their peak of emergence near midnight and early morning. brncici, most larvae left the host fruit between late evening and past midnight, meanwhile larvae from R. We found that these species differed significantly in their diel larval emergence. Field-collected fruits from host plants were checked daily for larval emergence, within 24 h, under laboratory conditions, in order to determine the time of the event. In this study, we explored whether these sympatric species differ in terms of the timing of their larval exit from the host fruit in search of pupation sites. Third-stage larvae must emerge from its host in search of pupation sites, and during this period larvae must find an appropriate pupation microhabitat while avoiding predation and adverse abiotic factors. conversa, can be found in sympatry, associated with the fruit of their native host plants Solanum tomatillo and S. ABSTRACT In central Chile, Rhagoletis brncici and R.
0 kommentar(er)
